Monday, January 30, 2017

Hope and Unconditional Love



E.C. Andercheck

It is in our moments deep in the valley of the shadows that we need to recall our faith and reach into that spiritual reservoir to have our soul revived. Here hope comes from the knowing that our God loves us unconditionally; in this we can believe - that regardless of our personal situation or our own failings God is with us. This belief can be traced to the teachings at the very beginning of the many Abrahamic faith traditions.
How might we join in God’s unconditional love and bring its resonance into our souls and experience the peace of amplified grace? Moses received this message for us all! The Hebrew Scripture says, “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before me … (you shall) show steadfast love to thousands of those who love me and keep my commandments. (Deut 5:6-21) Loving the thousands, who might not love us, and whom we might not agree with is the path that we must now consider.
Jesus taught this to his disciples when they asked,  “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the law?” And he said to him, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second is like it, You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the law and the prophets.” (Matthew 22:36-40) Love is amplified in the giving; just as our spirit is lifted up when we join in songs of praise to our Father in heaven.
                  It is so simple! Love God as he loves you and love your neighbor as God loves you, do this without conditions. This central message to all the faithful of Abraham is driven by the simplicity of a message God set in Commandments in stone for Moses, before the times of the ministries of Jesus or Muhammad. Yet it is so hard! Despite all of this teaching we find ourselves vulnerable in a world torn apart by the absence of love and amongst the triumph of divisions driven by conditionality and, yes by separations arising from religious beliefs.
God loves us unconditionally, let us join him by loving all of His children unconditionally and then with a hope filled heart await His loving grace and healing. This is a place of peace within love’s resonance; a place beside still waters where the reflection of God’s love is joined by our love opening our bodies to healing and our hearts to being lifted up with new hope. (cf. Psalm 23)


By E.C. Andercheck

Saturday, January 14, 2017

America needs a new King!

In his great speeches King’s voice continues to call out for freedom; just as God’s voice within us is calling out for a new kingdom, so that we may one day all sing out Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!” 





AMERICA NEEDS A NEW KING


By E.C. Andercheck



            The voice calling out for freedom and justice continues today, it continues to exclaim an urgent need for help, on behalf of the oppressed and marginalized, it calls from prisons, from underfunded schools and from the unemployment lines. It calls out from these hurting places giving witness to injustice and evidencing the persisting systematic impact of racist and classist policies. This voice calls out to all, to all who will listen, in a special way it demands that all Christians consider our society’s failure to deliver justice and preserve human dignity. This voice is God’s voice within us, exclaiming the need to renovate the core societal structures, which are failing too many of God’s people.
            The call to Religious Leadership might sound different today, but this call to justice is based on the same call for human rights and human dignity that called out in Birmingham Alabama to a young Martin Luther King Jr. in 1955.  The Montgomery Improvement Association began a new movement to bring an end to the segregationist and violent atrocities erupting from racism and oppression. The horrors from this lack of social justice were too often brutally fatal, however so is the outcome of a lack of economic justice today. Martin Luther King Jr.’s philosophy of personalism and human dignity lie at the liberation theology roots of the civil rights movement call to social justice, and today’s call to economic justice; these two calls are inseparable. Human suffering from poverty echoes the mid-twentieth century call for a liberating theological response.
I believe the message of human dignity and love, which were the theological underpinnings that Martin Luther King Jr. brought to the civil rights movement seeking social justice, would be the same if he were here to lead a call for economic justice today. It is my notion that in order to be effective agents of change, religious leaders today must ground their calls for economic and social justice firmly with liberating theological underpinnings of love and human dignity, recalling the lost memory of the work of the Black Church and Southern Christian Leadership Conference under Martin Luther King Jr.. Social justice cannot bloom into true liberation and economic justice under the racist and sexist clouds of classism allowing oppression of marginalized people. Today’s new social and cultural forms of evil might be subtler in their public action, but they are no less horrific in their crippling effect on people.
Martin Luther King Jr. provided a consistently strong theological message based on love and human dignity, with an unyielding moral vision of the urgent and immediate need to address the challenges facing the African American people and communities. This acted out evidence of his interiority, witnessing the depth of his work’s theological underpinnings provided the basis for the power of his leadership to be an agent of change. Dr. King’s moral vision of the dignity due to mankind as a human right, frames the ethical dilemma that struck directly at his core moral philosophy, which was built significantly on the objective ideal base derived from his study of Philosophy, Personalism and his Theology.

The need for a more effective agency of change in today’s struggle for economic justice is clearly calling out for prophetic leadership. In examining the role of the black preacher during a National Public Radio interview, Rev. Stephan Epps, asserted, “I don't think that our community has done, through the black church, as much to deal with the economic issues first, before politics.”[i] The future of the Black Church in America is challenged, as are her youth, unemployment is systemic for young Black men who suffer the lowest demographic propensity to graduate from high school in our country.  Our prisons host one out of every nine young Black men and one out of every one hundred Americans, a multiple of more than five times that of any other industrial society. An uninterrupted agenda of racialized social justice will clearly yield continued economic injustice, and uninterrupted classism predicts continued racialized poverty.
Viscount Nelson aligns the evolution of a ‘waning of Black Leadership’ with conservative domination, as evidenced at a 1980 forum, where he stated, “Thomas Sowell intended to move blacks away from the ‘old civil rights movement’ towards a more enlightened policy that would ameliorate the African American condition….reviewing the eighteen blacks and five whites attending the two day meeting, an overwhelming number comprised conservatives far to the right of mainstream African American society.”[ii]  In the midst of this message we might hear an echo of Joseph H. Jackson’s conservative priestly approach to focusing on the positive side and acquiescing to the suffering in survival. This new conservatism provides the framework for a personal agenda that allows the socially rising members of today’s more “consumerist” religious America to follow a Prosperity Gospel and ignore economic justice for the least of Christ’s people.
In contrast, Dr. King’s voice brought a visionary and prophetic call for immediate and unrestrained change, delivered within a theologically grounded message of love and portrayed through personal action in demonstrations witnessing his beliefs. Dr. King’s moral vision of the dignity due to human kind as a human right, this frames the moral dilemma that struck directly at his core. The  moral philosophy, which King built was derived from his study of Personalism. Kenneth Smith describes the “Themes of Personalism in King’s thoughts: Several themes occur and reoccur in King’s writings that are clearly traceable to the influence of personalism. These themes may be treated under the following headings: (1) the inherent worth of personality, (2) the personal God of love and reason, (3) the moral law of the cosmos, and (4) the social nature of human existence.”[iii]   The notion of Dr. King’s Beloved Community is built on moral philosophies of personalism and liberalism, it is demonstrated in the theological grounding of his speeches from Montgomery to Memphis. We see it in his numerous references to the redemptive value of love, notably in the story he tells of Abraham Lincoln and his great detractor Stanton, to his promotion of the hateful opponent to Secretary of War Stanton, then to the eulogizing loving and redeemed voice of an affectionate Stanton after Lincoln’s death.
Dr. King lived and studied in the north; both at Crozier Theological Seminary and at Boston University Graduate School, this opportunity provided a breadth of theological training and exposure to philosophical thinkers well grounded in Personalism. The Social Gospel was actively a part of that dialogue and King engaged it fully, drawing  a contribution to his theology. John Colin Harris summarized, “A logical consequence of the personalist perspective is an emphasis upon the relation of religion and philosophy to the total historical process. The social relevance of religious concepts and concerns was one of the emphases of Boston personalism that found fertile ground in King’s developing perspective.”[iv] The human condition of poverty and its debilitating effects on human personality were a pressing moral concern for Dr. King; Peter Paris said “King viewed economic justice as a necessary structural framework for the ultimate end, the blessed community.”[v]  King’s moral vision of the society’s treatment of individuals formed a necessary theological response, and already while in Boston he had begun the framing of the necessary political theories of change, which would become activated in Montgomery, Alabama before the ink on his thesis for Boston University was dry. John Ansbro asserts that, “King maintained that the social mission of the Christian Church requires that it have as its primary goal the development of the beloved community.”[vi] In the beloved community, Dr. King again defines his vision of a freedom obtained through God’s overarching love in society with love as the force directing the human social relationships and actions of each member.
 Shayne Lee has provided some important insights into American religion in his nuances regarding religion and economics in his book America’s New Preacher, T.D. Jakes. Certainly, self help ministries are accelerants for a providing a message of Christian Hope, and it is apparent that Jakes is doing so for many people. He is a business ‘success story’ coming from humble roots to shepherding a flock of 30,000 members in Potter’s House in Dallas and millions beyond in his TV Ministry. But this raises a question, not is he a great promoter of his ministry, but is he doing great ministry promoting justice for all of God’s people? I went to T. D. Jakes website and I couldn’t listen to a Potter’s House Sunday sermon without clicking in the donation button.   Is the prosperity gospel only for those who are already educated, employed and are self actualizing individuals without criminal records? Lee concludes, “T.D. Jakes mirrors an American dream tainted by materialism. But one thing that has not changed is that from the depth of his soul to the core of his experience, Thomas Dexter Jakes is an American Phenomenon.”[vii] The potential for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as a dream for all of mankind under an American democracy, has been perverted to an American dream of selfishness at anyone else’s expense. This is cause for reflection on our society’s ethics and our voter supported policies. A Christian community fails to be Christian if it prospers solely the few, mirroring a self enriching materialistic dream. This perversion might be caused by the loss of memory of Christian love, and cured by the consciousness religious leadership needs to recall from the lost memory of our church, community, family and religious history.
A continued search for systemic structural flaws that support economic injustice provides insight into King’s perspective on the failings of society; his genius was that in discovering the systemic failing he enabled the search for a path to cure. Johnny Hill gives us a glimpse of the international thought of Dr. King in his book Martin Luther King Jr. and Desmond Tutu, “King, in particular, was very concerned with America’s expanding imperialism abroad and the exploitation of American corporations in Latin America. As he turned his attention to the structural forces that perpetuate systems of poverty, he recognized there was a pattern of racialized poverty flowing from western nations across the globe.”[viii] Today, throughout the world and in America’s great cities, poverty is attacking human dignity and defeating Christian Hope.
In the introduction to A Call to Conscience: The Landmark Speeches of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. [ix] Andrew Young cites King’s daily involvement and moral commitment as a key part of Dr. King’s engaging leadership in the operations of the civil rights movement. Andrew Young said, Dr. King “Clearly delineated the moral issues” and as a leader he was a voice of hope to all men but, “He was first of all a man of faith, a preacher of the Gospel of Jesus.” The element of the devout Christian theologian within Dr. King is abundantly clear wherever he travels and deeply framed within his prophetic calls to action. His leadership’s moral and theological underpinnings are evidenced in the success of his calls for justice and in his movement of great forces to drive political change.
For many years the role of supporting the survival of a flock was the noble and primary charge of many pastors, this work was beneficial and in a manner consistent with “the priestly type” of religious leader as defined by Peter Paris[x]. But this is not the necessary agency of change for today, nor was it the approach of the young Dr. King who brought a prophetic non-violent approach to change. The liberating theology of Martin Luther King Jr. might be defined simply as a doctrine growing from the natural response to each of God’s people’s pain and the response of conscience to call for immediate and equal justice for each of God’s people. Our hope for political change must be based on a renewed Christian sense of conscience, faith in God, and the potential of a truly responsive representative democracy. Dr. King’s, ‘I Have A Dream’ Speech says it best,

“I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men are created equal……….I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, and every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight, and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed and all flesh shall see it together.”[xi]

In introducing a revival of Dr. King’s, ‘Where Do We Go from Here’ sermon, the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy spoke about, “the clarity of King’s vision of economic and social justice as inseparable in the fight against racism and classism.”[xii]  In Dr. King’s speech ‘Where Do We Go from Here’ he says discrimination and segregation successes are deeply felt….but Black Americans still live in the basement of the great society and there is a long way to go and,
“We have left the sands of Egypt….. but we must assert our dignity and worth.

A Majestic sense of self worth is what is needed

Power without love is reckless and abusive

Love without power is sentimental and anemic

Power at its best is

Love implementing the demands of Justice

And Justice at its best

 is love correcting everything that stands against love.”[xiii]


The call to economic justice is clearly a Christian Agape Love based ideal asking for justice to empower the oppressed; this should resonate with all truly Christian people. However, true economic justice policy results can only be obtained if the agency for change implements the call to action with an appreciation of the system.
 What is the mysterious formulation for a Christian Ideal to become fully acted out in a representative democracy today? First, the theological underpinnings must be well formed at the foundation of the interiority of the prophetic agency for change. This economic justice message delivered with intensity and emotional impact will necessarily agitate systemic structures and threaten institutions.  Second, the agency of change cannot be successful without legitimizing credentials recognized by a large community of followers and the agents must be seen as being concerned with systemic reform, not institutional destruction. In the absence of credentialization, or reforming goals the agent of change will agitate more fear than the institutional stakeholders can tolerate and the agency will be denied or terminated.  
It is my appraisal that Dr. King’s leadership contained the key essential elements for prophetic religious change agency, well grounded in a moral vision of human equality, based on a Christian theology of agape love, and driven to bring about a societal systemic change through a political renovation not a revolution. There is a strong argument to support the notion that the Civil Rights movement gained its degree of success so directly because of the concurrent, if not always unified, activity of multiple types of religious leaders. This having been said, if we combine within our agency of change the elements of the leaders of the civil rights movement we see agitation to revolution with a balancing set of calls to reasonable renovation. I would make the case that the civil rights movement could not have achieved the degree of success it did without the extraordinary liberationist leadership of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., a theologically endowed prophetic leader and I believe he is the most effective leadership model for the center of today’s economic justice agency for change.
             In order to bring about an assault sufficient to commence a real change in economic justice in America today, I envision the need for an agency of change with a prophetic call sounded through a strong theological message with a well credentialized socio political approach.  Religious leadership will have to unify in calling out for God’s power to advance the democratic principles of our nation to foster massive new social enterprises, commit substantial government resources to support the re entry of prisoners into the main stream of American life, to equally educate all Americans and to be certain that every American who can work has a job or a government job and those who cannot work will have a life saving net of dignified public support. In working towards the beloved community, Dr. King said “We are tied together in a single garment of destiny, caught in an inescapable network of mutuality.”[xiv]  Kenneth Smith summarizes, “This was King’s homiletical way of affirming that reality is composed of structures that form an interrelated whole.”[xv] Martin Luther King Jr.’s work provides both a theological and an ethical vision of the Liberation Praxis necessary to address the challenges facing the American people today.
 America’s need for a new King (a modern day version of Martin Luther King, Jr.) is more evident than ever; it is love that brings freedom and polarization that enslaves. King knew Freedom was never easily achieved; but he knew the fight would be worth it when one day we could all sing out “Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!” In his great speeches King’s voice continues to calls out for freedom; just as God’s voice within us is calling out for a new kingdom.

Edward C Andercheck





[i] Stephan Epps, Examining the role of the Black Preacher, In a National Public Radio interview, (New York, National Public Radio, 2007)

[ii] Nelson Viscount, The Rise and Fall of Modern Black Leadership,  (New York, University Press of America, 2003) ,pg251

[iii] Kenneth L. Smith, Search for the Beloved Community: The thinking of Martin Luther King, Jr., (Valley Forge, Judson Press, 1974), 104.

[iv] John Colin Harris, The Theology of Martin Luther King, Jr.,(PhD diss., Duke University Department of Religion, 1974), 97.

[v]  Peter J. Paris, Black Religious Leaders Conflict in Unity, (Louisville, Westminster/John Knox Press, 1991), 140.

[vi] John J. Ansbro, Martin Luther King Jr.,Nonviolent Strategies and Tactics for Social Change, (New York, Madison Books, 2000), 187.

[vii] Shayne Lee’s, America’s New Preacher, T. D. Jakes,(2005, NYU Press,) 189

[viii] Johnny Bernard Hill, The Theology of Martin Luther King Jr. and Desmond TuTu,(New York, Palgrave MacMillan, 2007), 159.

[ix] Andrew Young, A Call to Conscience: The Landmark Speeches of Dr. Martin Luther King jr., Hachette Audio compact disc, 2009.

[x] Peter J. Paris, Black Religious Leaders Conflict in Unity, (Louisville, Westminster/John Knox Press, 1991), 17.

[xi]Martin Luther King Jr.,  speeches that changed the world, (London, Smith Davies, 2005), 152

Xi    Edward M. Kennedy, A Call to Conscience: The Landmark Speeches of Dr. Martin Luther King jr.,    Hachette Audio compact disc, 2009.

Xii   Martin Luther King Jr., Where do we go from here, Speeches that changed the world, (London, Smith Davies, 2005), 152

[xiv] Martin Luther King Jr., The speeches that changed the world, (London, Smith Davies, 2005), 154.

[xv] Smith, Kenneth L. , Search for the Beloved Community: The thinking of Martin Luther King, Jr., (Valley Forge, Judson Press, 1974)





















Partial Bibliography

Ansbro, John J., Martin Luther King Jr.: Nonviolent Strategies and Tactics for Social Change, (New York, Madison Books, 2000)

Epps, Stephan, Examining the role of the Black Preacher, In a National Public Radio interview, (New York, National Public Radio, 2007

Harris, John Colin, The Theology of Martin Luther King, Jr.,(PhD diss., Duke University Department of Religion, 1974)

Hill, Johnny Bernard, The Theology of Martin Luther King Jr. and Desmond TuTu,(New York, Palgrave MacMillan, 2007)

Kennedy, Edward M. , A Call to Conscience: The Landmark Speeches of Dr. Martin Luther King jr., Hachette Audio compact disc, 2009.

King, Martin Luther Jr., I Have a Dream, speeches that changed the world, (London, Smith Davies, 2005)

Lee, Shayne, America’s New Preacher, T. D. Jakes,(New York, NYU Press, 2005)

Nelson, Viscount, The Rise and Fall of Modern Black Leadership,  (New York, University Press of America, 2003)

Paris, Peter J.,Black Religious Leaders Conflict in Unity, (Louisville, Westminster/John Knox Press, 1991)

Smith, Kenneth L. , Search for the Beloved Community: The thinking of Martin Luther King, Jr., (Valley Forge, Judson Press, 1974)

Young, Andrew, A Call to Conscience: The Landmark Speeches of Dr. Martin Luther King jr., Hachette Audio compact disc, 2009